nice-shampoo-1738
11/22/2023, 12:22 PMfull-receptionist-33755
11/22/2023, 1:12 PMadamant-psychiatrist-15548
11/22/2023, 1:54 PMflaky-dinner-61668
11/22/2023, 3:13 PMflaky-dinner-61668
11/22/2023, 3:19 PMglamorous-keyboard-76926
11/22/2023, 10:13 PMagreeable-france-58035
11/22/2023, 10:57 PMbreezy-summer-94671
11/23/2023, 2:08 AMrelation "tracks" does not exist
which is not true, it does exist
2. I am able to set up a metric manually with SQL but when I go to analyse the results of an experiment, the query fails and says relation "experiment_viewed" does not exist
It seems that the generated SQL does not include the schema/prefix that it should be including in order to access my warehouse, like it is for the actual metricfull-honey-74660
11/23/2023, 12:08 PMfamous-belgium-62991
11/23/2023, 1:10 PMfast-area-38078
11/23/2023, 1:43 PMquick-ocean-48293
11/24/2023, 6:20 AMagreeable-activity-31366
11/24/2023, 11:15 AMbrash-dinner-77471
11/24/2023, 2:29 PMfull-receptionist-33755
11/24/2023, 3:03 PMagreeable-france-58035
11/25/2023, 4:06 AMawesome-engineers
is set to receive the value as 'ON'.
I was able to test that it works correctly using the simulation.
However, when I try to get the value in code using EvalFeature, it still seems to return it as False. Have I missed something here?
Attaching the code snippet.
var grp []string
grp = append(grp, "awesome-engineers")
growthbookCtx.WithAttributes(growthbook.Attributes{
"id": "test123",
"$groups": grp,
})
Val := growthbookCtx.EvalFeature("group-test").Value // Somehow returns False
high-policeman-41804
11/25/2023, 6:13 PMclever-hair-5481
11/27/2023, 2:48 PMcurator-onboarding
) that we set to 100% control on our prod env, as we’re hiding it from users until it’s completely build out. When we switched to 100% on the dev env (keeping prod env at 100% control), we received reports of users seeing the experience sometimes on our prod env — when looking at the logs it appeared to be happening 15% of the time. After switching dev back to 100% control, we no longer see any instances of prod users getting the experimental version. Do you know why this is occurring and how to prevent?
Company: groover
Feature name: curator-onboarding
Cells: control
, new-flow
swift-alligator-40824
11/27/2023, 10:38 PMtall-branch-42668
11/27/2023, 10:42 PMpage_view
Metric we set up.
We're getting a good split of users, set at 50/50. But getting pretty different results on page views between the Control and the Variant even though the UX is identical. Any ideas what might be happening? And why the "Risk of Choosing" percents are so different from each other?wide-jordan-14758
11/28/2023, 12:39 AMuser_id_1
explicitly, e.g. whatever the value is for test_meta_data.test_user_id
it will be used as the column name to select in test_clickstream
. Has anyone encountered this type of dynamic column selection?
(cc @ambitious-apartment-58735 @orange-magician-36994)
select
case when test_meta_data.test_user_id = 'user_id_1' then USER_ID_1
else USER_ID_2 end as USER_ID,
timestamp,
pageview as value
from test_clickstream
join
(select test_user_id
from test_meta_data
where experiment_id = '{{ experimentId }}') test_meta_data
miniature-agency-3305
11/28/2023, 2:23 PMconsole.log('1.1.5' > '1.1.12'); // true, with Semver this would be false
wooden-river-6675
11/28/2023, 3:25 PMwooden-river-6675
11/28/2023, 3:35 PMwooden-river-6675
11/28/2023, 3:37 PMapiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: growthbook-web
namespace: dev-growthbook
labels:
app: growthbook-web
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: growthbook-web
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: growthbook-web
spec:
containers:
- name: growthbook-web
image: growthbook/growthbook:latest
env:
- name: APP_ORIGIN
value: <https://example.com>
- name: API_HOST
value: <https://example.com/backend>
- name: MONGODB_URI
value: "<mongodb://root:password@growthbook-mongo:27017/growthbook>"
- name: JWT_SECRET
value: your_jwt_sfsdhfhdss
ports:
- containerPort: 3000
name: web
- containerPort: 3100
name: api
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: growthbook-web
namespace: dev-growthbook
spec:
ports:
- name: web
port: 3000
targetPort: 3000
- name: api
port: 3100
targetPort: 3100
selector:
app: growthbook-web
wooden-river-6675
11/28/2023, 3:37 PMpowerful-waitress-32504
11/28/2023, 4:55 PMminiature-television-64304
11/28/2023, 6:46 PMimport { GrowthBook } from "@growthbook/growthbook";
never successfully imports and always prints out Uncaught TypeError: Failed to resolve module specifier "@growthbook/growthbook". Relative references must start with either "/", "./", or "../".
. Is this something you can help me resolve?orange-chef-81249
11/28/2023, 7:50 PMhelpful-alligator-75316
11/28/2023, 9:26 PM