hi growthbook. what’s the best way to create an experiment in two environments? This is our workflow right now: 1. create feature flag and only toggle active in dev environment 2. create AB Experiment in dev environment 3. develop our code 4. when we’re ready to go live, click on the 3 dots in the dev experiment and

copy to prod

5. toggle feature active in prod This was working fine, but now the environment thats copied to (so prod in this case), no longer ever evaluates to the variant. It always returns the control. I recreated the steps but swapping dev and prod (so create in prod first and then copy to dev) and i see the same result. Using Growthbook devtools, I see the variant value. But when I log the result from

evalFeature

it, I see the control value.

Hey, I have a question regard the user id for Mixpanel integration. The example uses the

mixpanel.get_distinct_id()

function to set the growthbook user attr id. I assume we can switch this out to be a long live id as mixpanel device ids change when users logout. Does this effect report on experiments at all? Would we need the long live id in Mixpanel?

Hello I've been trying to get an A/B test to run or even preview in draft mode. I have the SDK setup through GTM. I made the changes using the visual editor. The SDK does have all the visual experiments turned on. I've gone to the page that the changes were made on - didn't see any changes, I've checked the dev panel tool and it says no experiments. Here is my code snippet from GTM with the api replaced with x's any help would be appreciated on what I need to do to get this running and working.

<script>
  (function() {
    // Wait for the SDK to load before starting GrowthBook
    if (window.growthbook) {
      startGrowthbook();
    } else {
      document.querySelector("#growthbook-sdk").addEventListener("load", startGrowthbook);
    }

    function startGrowthbook() {
      if (!window.growthbook) return;
      gtag('get', 'G-6GFJGEGDHC', 'client_id', function(cid) {
      var gb = new growthbook.GrowthBook({
        apiHost: "<https://cdn.growthbook.io>",
        enableDevMode: true,
        clientKey: "sdk-xxxxxxxxxxxxx",
        // TODO: Add decryptionKey if using encryption
        attributes: {
          id: cid // TODO: Read user/device id from a cookie/datalayer
        },
        trackingCallback: function(experiment, result) {
          console.log(result);
          analytics.track("Experiment Viewed", {
      experimentId: experiment.key,
      variationId: result.key,
    });
          // TODO: track experiment impression
        }
      });
console.log(gb);
        console.log(gb.experiment);
        console.log(cid);
      // TODO: Instrument DOM with AB test logic
      
      });     
  }
      
  })();
</script>

I have created an experiment, and I want two groups to be added to that specific experiment, group 1 (Internal Users) should only be shown experiment version and remaining users should have divided traffic. I can't find a way to link this group to the experiment. Can someone help me with this

Hi everyone! Quick question. Is there any reason to disable GB experiment log collection for bots (Googlebot, etc.)?

We have an A/B/C test and we want to kill one of the groups and keep running the experiment with only two groups. Should we assign 0% of traffic to C to accomplish this? Is there a way to reassign users in group C to either A or B? If we do a new A/B experiment with a different tracking key we are at risk of users that got B before getting A now, right?

Hey, how can I set up an experiment on a wordpress site? I have GA4 linked but can’t figure out how to actually make a traffic split. Usually AB testing sites have a javascript snippet to install on your website but I don’t see that in the GrowthBook docs. I can see PHP and Node SDKs but those won’t work on wordpress. I need to be able to do a split URL test where 50% of the audience goes to URL 1, and the other 50% goes to URL 2 then somehow monitor that in growthbook

Hi team, Can we access Growthbook's service via VPN peering? Currently, I face some rate limiting issues and was thinking VPC peering may reduce latency.

Similarly we want to be able to slowly decrease traffic to an experiment.

If I convert from a rollout rule to an experiment rule, will the groups of users be the same?