I am trying to figure out why the confidence interval isn’t shown for the revenue metric, is it because of the “suspicious result” notification or some other reason? Usually it’s because there’s not enough data, but when there isn’t, there is a notification that mentions it

Is it possible the metric has a Max Percent Change that is lower than 114? perhaps 100? https://www.loom.com/share/8668ce095380421a9e66a1835b67dc85

Hi Luke. Yet, it was lower than that. However, the tag disappeared but I’m still seing this “Chance to beat control” that is suspiciously stuck at 50%,

This is probably the result of our particular bayesian approach causing problems when a group mean could potentially being negative (large variance and enough of the posterior is negative) and the 50% is a default return value when we can't compute uncertainty accurately. I can confirm this if you share the users, sums and sums of squares from the raw query. We're aware just returning 50% is a bad user experience and improving it is our intention.