Feedback regarding scheduling of experiments (trie...
# give-feedback
h
Feedback regarding scheduling of experiments (tried searching on this, but couldn't find anything): As we are getting more comfortable with the tool, we now wanted to start working with scheduling experiments to reduce the manual work of having to remember to turn on and off the experiment. I had two experiments that were supposed to start this morning using the feature, but I noticed that they never went live and the scheduling was gone from the feature. When asking the support AI it said that I must first put the experiments as running since the feature rule can't move it from draft and then the scheduling should work. I've attached two images of what it should look like from my understanding. The issue with this approach is that it really doesn't (imo) make sense to have an experiment as running if it's not running. There is nothing on the experiment page either that suggests that it's scheduled to start running at a specific time either, which makes it more confusing. The same goes for when the rule is disabled. The experiment is still "running". If this is not already something you have in your backlog to look over, i'd be more than happy to submit a github request 🚀
s
Thanks for the feedback. I can see why this can be confusing! I see some conversations that this issue has been raised before. Let me check with the team to see if there are any updates on scheduling experiment workflows.
h
Thanks Ryan!