This message was deleted.
# ask-questions
w
This message was deleted.
f
you can use fact tables to get very close to this
with filters
p
Hmm in this scenario don't we still end up with a separate metric for every thing we want to filter by
i definitely agree its an easier way to manage those
i'm trying to avoid having a list of 50 'Bookings: {{city}}' metrics in my metrics list
if i have 50 cities
f
I see
how would GrowthBook know the namespace for the cities?
p
I guess really what I would like is for there to be a templated/filtered metric that gets configured with the template variable/filter at the time it is added to an experiment but otherwise doesn't pollute my list of overall metrics. I don't mind having a a 'Bookings {{cityFilter}}' metric in my list of metrics but having 50 of them along with N other metrics that need 50 versions of that metric seems unwieldy. Some part of this discussion is a theoretical problem not an actual one for us right now. We are running 4 experiments right now that fit this description and may end up tracking 6-7 metrics for each so its not a huge number but its highly likely we will run similar experiments in the future. I think our plan right now is to run the experiments and then archive the filtered metrics so they don't crowd our metric list.
117 Views